headergraphic
  Home | CQE Research | Press Center | About Us
 

State Percentages of Failing Schools

The following chart reflects the number of schools that did not make adequate yearly progress (AYP) according to the federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) law for school year 2005-2006. NCLB requires schools to meet up to 40 separate indicators‹missing just one indicator results in the school missing AYP. If this occurs two years in a row the school is labeled as being "in need of improvement" and must offer school choice, where parents have the option to transfer their children out of their current school. This is the first of many increasingly severe sanctions imposed by NCLB.

These indicators include: testing at least 95% of students, having a certain percentage of the students scoring at grade level on state tests (e.g., proficient), and maintaining a certain attendance and graduation rate. Students with disabilities, limited English proficiency, and from major racial and economically disadvantaged backgrounds are judged separately and must attain the same level of proficiency and participation rates as all the others.

There are many shortcomings of this system. A school missing only one indicator is judged the same as a school that misses 40 indicators. In addition, getting students with disabilities and limited English proficiency to reach the same expectations as other students is extremely challenging. The percentage of students required to be proficient increases to 100% by 2013-2014. Schools that are further away from the proficiency requirement must make bigger strides in improvement, while schools already above the proficiency requirement do not need to improve right way or could even get worse and still make AYP. Many education experts are asking that the federal government allow them to change NCLB to recognize student growth and achievement over time (growth models).

Many states made significant changes to their state plan for implementing NCLB in 2005, which resulted in the percentage of schools missing AYP to decrease. Other states have already made these changes or still have not and their percentages have increased. For more information about these numbers, please contact Scott Young at (202) 454-5671 or .



State 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 Release Date
Alabama 4.6% 76.5% 47.0% 8/11/05
Alaska 57.8% 41.6% 41.0% 8/12/05
Arizona 23.8% 17.8% 21.0% 9/1/05
Arkansas        
California 46.0% 34.6% 44.1% 8/31/05
Colorado 24.8% 21.4% 24.3% 9/21/05
Connecticut 46.3% 19.0% 20.0% 9/7/05
DC 55.0% 57.7% 60.1% 8/2/05
Delaware 56.4% 26.0% 33.7% 8/3/05
Florida 87.1% 76.6% 64.2%  
Georgia 36.3% 21.1% 19.5% 7/8/05
Hawaii 60.0% 48.2% 66.3% 8/19/05
Idaho 43.0% 17.9% 33.5% 8/15/05
Illinois 31.6% 28.6% 27.2% 9/21/05
Indiana 23.1% 23.8% 40.1% 6/8/05
Iowa        
Kansas        
Kentucky 39.9% 24.5% 25.9% 8/2/05
Louisiana        
Maine        
Maryland 38.9% 13.9% 20.2%  
Massachusetts        
Michigan 25.8% 22.1% 11.9% 8/19/05
Minnesota 7.3% 23.6% 12.5% 8/28/05
Mississippi       9/1/05
Missouri 49.1% 22.8% 35.3% 8/19/05
Montana 20.0% 14.0% 6.9% 8/17/05
Nebraska        
Nevada 40.3% 37.0% 55.8% 8/2/05
New Hampshire        
New Jersey 40.7% 24.4% 35.5% 8/10/05
New Mexico 22.0% 33.8% 54.3% 8/1/05
New York        
North Carolina 53.0% 29.2% 42.8% 8/1/05
North Dakota 9.3% 9.8% 9.3% 8/3/05
Ohio 21.9% 17.0% 24.3% 8/15/05
Oklahoma        
Oregon 27.0% 31.2% 34.8% Preliminary 8/4/05
Pennsylvania 37.0% 18.8% 23.8% 9/21/05
Rhode Island 29.9% 30.5% 19.1% 8/28/05
South Carolina        
South Dakota 31.3% 14.8% 16.0%  
Tennessee 45.2% 19.1% 21.1% 8/3/05
Texas 8.2% 5.7% 12.8% 8/11/05
Utah 28.4% 17.6% 12.8% 9/21/05
Vermont        
Virginia 41.0% 27.7% 18.8% 8/16/05
Washington        
West Virginia 40.5% 27.8% 16.8% 8/30/05
Wisconsin        
Wyoming 14.8% 8.0% 20.0% 8/3/05